GCSE and A-level exams in 2022 could be ‘adapted’ for learning loss – regulator
By Eleanor Busby, PA Education Correspondent
Students taking A-level and GCSE exams next year could see their assessments adapted to compensate for learning loss, the acting chief regulator of Ofqual has suggested.
Simon Lebus, acting chief of England’s exams regulator, said the process of recovering lost learning during the pandemic is “going to take several years”.
He told MPs that students taking A-level assessments in 2022 “will not have sat public exams before”.
His comments came after the Government confirmed last month that teachers in England will decide pupils’ A-level and GCSE grades this summer after exams were cancelled for the second year in a row.
When asked about the arrangements for students due to take exams next year, Mr Lebus said the regulator was considering adaptations similar to those proposed before exams were cancelled.
Pupils due to sit exams this summer were set to receive advance notice of some topics ahead of tests – as well as exam aids when sitting papers – before the Government scrapped the exams altogether.
Mr Lebus told the education select committee: “As far as 2022 is concerned, the thinking at the moment is about adaptations along the lines that had been originally contemplated for this year when exams were still to go ahead.
“That’s based on the reality of the cohort taking exams next year will have suffered considerable disruption to their learning.
“Though we would hope not on the scale and the level that has been suffered by this year’s cohort so that it would be the reasonable thing to carry out some form of public exams, but that they would be adapted to reflect the learning disruption that has taken place.”
His comments came as MPs raised concerns about possible grade inflation or “grade suppression” this summer after teachers have been given the responsibility to decide what grades pupils will receive.
Mr Lebus urged parents to give teachers the space to decide pupils’ A-level and GCSE grades so they do not feel “uncomfortable” as he insisted that teacher judgment was “pretty reliable”.
He said: “We’ve created a system which I think there are good incentives to allow teacher judgment to flourish and we’ve all got to play our part to support that.”
Mr Lebus added: “I also think it’s very important that parents give teachers the space to do it because it’s always a worry that parents get terribly involved and teachers feel uncomfortable and there’s an intrusive interest so I think that’s a really important point and I wholly agree with it.”
Schools minister Nick Gibb said “parents can be reassured” that this year’s approach to grading is the “best alternative to exams that can be devised”.
Tory MP Robert Halfon, chair of the education select committee, questioned whether grade inflation would last for years and whether an “all must have prizes” approach to grades had been adopted.
In response, Mr Gibb said: “No. This is a system where we trust the professionalism of teachers. They are the people who know their children well.”
Exam boards will carry out random sample checks of students’ grades this summer as part of the quality assurance process.
Jonathan Gullis, Conservative MP for Stoke-on-Trent North, raised concerns that pupils in some areas of the country, including his contingency, who do not benefit from having “sharp-elbowed parents” could become “victims of grade suppression” as schools may seek to avoid investigation over their grades.
But Mr Lebus said: “I think the idea that there will be any systematic pressure on teachers to underestimate student performance because they were worried about the school being subject to aggressive scrutiny, I don’t think it’s going to work like that, that’s not the intention.”